Some say that Srila Prabhupada taught just the ABCD in his books, but that’s not what I find when I read them. Instead, what I find is a very ingenious presentation of a philosophy that is extraordinarily complex, but that Srila Prabhupada is able to express in relatively simple words, without however shying away from all the esoteric details.

This sentence I just wrote may sound like a contradiction. How can someone write in a simple way, but at the same time convey all the details? Normally these two ideas are exclusive. Or we explain something in a simple way, omitting details, or we explain all the details, but risk making the presentation incomprehensible. Indeed, this is generally true for ordinary authors, but sometimes a great genius is capable of offering explanations that are simple, but at the same time contain a surprising volume of detail, that can be progressively understood as one’s comprehension of the subject increases.

What I observe when I read Prabhupada’s books is exactly this stroke of genius, of being capable of explaining the intricate nature of Vaishnava philosophy in relatively simple words, using examples that can be understood by the layman, but at the same time hiding in the same text all the intricate details that readers can gain access as they progress in their comprehension and spiritual realization. The first time we read Prabhupada’s books, the text may seem simplistic, and at times even repetitive, but as we gradually advance in our studies we start to notice how deep the explanations actually are.

Many senior devotees who have been studying Prabhupada’s books for many decades give the advice of studying the same books repeatedly. As astonishing as it may seem, some devotees maintain a sadhana of reading the whole Srimad Bhagavatam once every year, for example! Some of these devotees already read the whole Bhagavatam dozens of times, and still, they continue finding new meanings every time they go through it again.

In fact, all transcendental literature is like that. It is not made to be read just once, like a romance, but structured in a way that the deeper our understanding is, the more details of the text we can understand when we read it. People in previous ages were apparently capable of grasping all the intricacies of the verses after hearing them just once or at maximum three times, but this happened because not only did they have much sharper memories and intelligence, but there was a system that a student would not be instructed in a certain text before accumulating the necessary qualification to understand it. People were thus forced to study the sastras under the spiritual masters for a long period, and in a certain order, different from today where any layman can have immediate access to all kinds of esoteric books.

In the age we live in, therefore, the only way for us to fully understand a spiritual book is to read it repeatedly, while at the same time hearing from experienced devotees, asking questions, and so on. The first time we read we may not get much out of it (due to our own lack of realization), but as we progress we can understand progressively more as we read it again and again.

Here we have two traps. The first trap is the new devotee who tries to read Prabhupada’s books, but loses his or her interest after some time, not finding it interesting. What happens here is that one gives up right in the initial stages, before one has enough realization to start being able to really understand and appreciate the books.

Another trap is one who reads all the books once and comes to the conclusion that he already understood all the basics and that now is the time to move to more advanced books. He then stops reading Prabhupada’s books (that he considers now as containing just the ABCD) and starts reading translations of the works of the previous acaryas and often even from other philosophical schools. The problem is that this study of dubious translations without a very solid understanding of the basics results in misunderstandings. As a result, although studying so many books one remains confused about the most basic aspects of Vaishnava philosophy.

Some may judge themselves as very advanced and consider that Prabhupada’s books contain just basic knowledge. I suspect however that the problem in many such cases is that one may lack a very deep understanding of Vaishnava philosophy and thus not be really able to go very deep into what Prabhupada is explaining there. The accusation that Prabhupada explains only the ABCD in his books is thus a confession of their own lack of philosophical depth.

One thing I understood is that independence is a very intrinsic characteristic of the soul, something that even Krsna respects. According to Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura, independence is in fact what distinguishes the soul from inanimate matter. If independence were taken away from the soul, it would just become a thing, instead of a living being. It’s because of our inherent independence that we can cultivate relationships with Krsna.

One may use his independence to study all kinds of books, accept all kinds of conclusions, and accuse Prabhupada of being superficial in his writings, but as far as I’m concerned, I can’t agree with it.

The approach I personally take and that I consider the secret of whatever little success I have been able to make in my spiritual path is to start from the principle that Prabhupada is speaking the truth from a transcendental, perfect perspective, and from this prism try to understand his teachings, and the world around me, including other philosophical treatises written by the previous acaryas and other great teachers.

All the statements Prabhupada makes in his books should be taken as part of a greater philosophical explanation. When two statements appear to be contradictory, they should be harmonized. In this process one may ask the spiritual master, more learned Vaishnavas, or simply wait for Krsna to give the knowledge from inside the heart, but one should not conclude that one statement is correct and the other is wrong. Spiritual topics are very complex and can be studied from many angles. The habit of cherry picking, pitting one statement against the other is part of our material conditioning and should be given up. It just imprisons us to the material duality and makes us see everything as black or white, good or bad, and thus incapable of understanding spiritual topics that are always multidimensional.

Later, the same process should be used to harmonize statements from Srila Prabhupada with the writings of previous acaryas, understanding that they are describing the same spiritual reality and are in agreement with each other.

As stated in the Laghu Bhagavatamrta (5.327), “When contradictions are found in the Vedic scripture, it is not that one statement is wrong. Rather both statements should be seen in such a way that there is no contradiction.” There are different statements from Srila Prabhupada spoken in different contexts and even cases of statements that may appear contradictory. If one goes deeper, however, it will be revealed that they are just applications of different principles in different contexts.

When I study, translations of works from previous acaryas, I don’t presume I can directly understand the content of these books, nor do I presume that the translations are completely accurate. Although the original books are perfect, the translations are often done by devotees who are not completely familiar with all the intricacies of the language and often apply their own philosophical biases to the text. Unless a translation is done by a self-realized soul (like the works of Srila Prabhupada), everything should always be taken with a grain of salt.

Instead, I just try to understand the general logic of the text and interpret it according to the conclusions Prabhupada gives in his books. I found that this method allows one to study even difficult books, such as the Vedanta Sutra, as well as books compiled by conditioned souls, such as the Bible, in the light of the Vaishnava philosophy.

So far, I have been observing that it’s thanks to these conclusions I get from Prabhupada’s books that I’m able to get a grasp on other philosophical books I have the opportunity to study. Without having spent time studying in detail the points that Prabhupada makes in his books, I doubt I would be able to understand these books at all.

If a new devotee would ask me for advice about how to clearly understand the different details of Vaishnava philosophy, I would tell him or her to, apart from following a good sadhana and serving Vaishnavas, to just study all Prabhupada’s books repeatedly starting from the conviction that they contain an accurate description of the absolute truth, and starting from this perspective try to understand the reality around us, including other books one may decide to study later. I found that devotees who practice under this prism are the ones who go the furthest in spiritual life.

I believe the whole idea of Parampara is based on this principle, and the ones who start their spiritual lives by reading Prabhupada’s books but later reject his teachings are missing the whole point and thus sabotaging their own spiritual progress.