Does Bhakti include a culture that we need to adopt in order to be able to serve Krsna? Can I just keep my own culture, continuing to dress in the same way, eat the same type of food, and so on, and at the same time worship Krsna?
It’s possible to put forward arguments on both sides. Yes, Bhakti includes a form of culture, in the form of the classic Vedic culture and the system of Varnasrama, which is favorable for the cultivation of love for Krsna, but at the same time, bhakti can be practiced by people in all ways of life, regardless of which type of culture they identify with. Both ideas are simultaneously acceptable, and we can see that Prabhupada emphasizes one or the other side while talking to different people in different circumstances. Just following rules is not as important as understanding the essence of it.
In Teachings of Lord Caitanya, it’s described that when Lord Caitanya asked Ramananda Raya about the ultimate goal of human life, Ramananda answered that “A person who is sincere in performing his occupational duty will gradually develop a sense of God consciousness”, emphasizing the usefulness of the system of Varnasrama (and the Vedic culture that it includes) as a platform favorable for the practice of Bhakti.
Srila Prabhupada explains this passage by emphasizing the idea of dovetailing our activities with Krsna. This is a point that is very well explained in the Bhagavad-Gita. We often think that Varnasrama is just a set of rules, but this is just the external part of it. The essence of the Varnasrana system is to teach people to perform their activities as an offering to Krsna, and thus gradually awaken their Krsna Consciousness. He emphasizes that “regulated life is the source of perfection for everyone. One who leads a regulated life centered around devotional service to the Lord attains perfection.”
At the same time, however, Srila Prabhupada mentions that just following rules and regulations as a cultural or religious practice, without developing Krsna Consciousness is just a waste of time. We can see that that’s precisely the mistake we commit when we promote Varnasrama as just a set of rules, instead of emphasizing the essence of the system, which is learning to perform our activities as a service to Krsna.
Of course, the conversation of Lord Caitanya with Ramananda Raya was supposed to go much higher than a simple talk about rules and regulations, or even a discussion about Karma-yoga, and therefore Lord Caitanya rejected this offer as “external” and requested Ramananda Raya to go deeper into the topic, all the way up to the pure love of the gopis to Krsna, with which he was finally satisfied. This doesn’t mean however that talks about Varnasrama and Karma-Yoga are not important. The first step of a stair is as important as the last since without going through it we can’t reach the top.
Another mistake is to confuse Varnasrama with Hinduism. Varnasrama is the pure system described in the Vedas, which is not currently practiced on a large scale anywhere in the world, while Hinduism is the current cultural identity of the Indian people. Hinduism is much closer to Vedic culture than most other cultures in the world, but it is important to understand that it is not an equivalent. Indian people still need to understand and change to meet the Vedic standards and be careful to not change the system, mixing it with their cultural background, just like people from other places of the world. As Srila Prabhupada mentions in the introduction of Sri Isopanisad: “You may call the Vedas Hindu, but “Hindu” is a foreign name. We are not Hindus. Our real identification is varṇāśrama. Varṇāśrama denotes the followers of the Vedas”.
In this way, there is a cultural system that is conducive to the practice of the process of Bhakti, and this system can be divided into two parts. The first part is an external set of rules and regulations to regulate human behavior and prevent people from doing things that will harm their spiritual progress (such as different immoral acts), as well as to cultivate habits that are conducive to their spiritual practice, and the second part is the essential consciousness of dovetailing our activities with the service to Krsna.
The first part, the external set of rules, may be adapted to different cultures. We know that in Vedic culture women used saris, for example, but saris may be replaced by some other type of chaste clothing, as long as the principle of covering one’s body and dressing in a way that may be pleasing to Krsna is maintained. Similarly, people in Vedic culture were eating preparations such as rice, dhal, different types of boiled and fried vegetables, milk sweets, and so on. The preparations may change according to the place and available ingredients, but the essence of cooking pure food and offering it to Krsna before honoring it as prasadam must be maintained.
In other words, it’s important to follow the principles of the Vaishnava culture as part of our process of Bhakti, since without it we may be stuck in the sinful platform and thus not be able to reach the ultimate goal of love for Krsna (women dressing in mini-skirts and men drinking beer may not be very favorable). On the other hand, is also essential to understand the essence of the Varnasrama culture and find practical ways to apply it to our reality, instead of trying to reduce the system to a stereotyped set of rules.
One of the greatest mistakes we make when we try to broadcast Krsna Consciousness is to impose our personal stereotyped beliefs or preferences into the Bhakti process and start to insist that others should also accept them in the same dogmatic way as we do. This causes much of the quarreling and division we see among different Vaishnava groups.
That’s just yet another example of the tridimensionality of spiritual topics, in opposition to the duality of material considerations. Under the lower modes of nature, we tend to see duality, black and white, hot and cold, and so on. Our understanding of different topics becomes thus flat, like a chapati, and we become incapable of considering more than two sides. This mentality however doesn’t work very well with spiritual topics, which are tridimensional in nature, with different possible points of view which are ultimately harmonized into a higher understanding. When our consciousness is limited to the material platform, we fail to understand all these delicate points and tend to just polarize and quarrel over the two sides of the chapati.
Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura explains in his Jaiva Dharma that all forms of culture are reflections of distortions of the Varnasrama system. All kinds of organized society contain certain aspects of the Varnasrama system since no society can function without at least some vestiges of it. In all societies, there are intellectual and religionists, politicians and military men, farmers and businessmen, and different types of workers. This natural division is found everywhere, all the way from aboriginal tribes to modern capitalist and communist countries. The point is that these different societies are organized in a more or less accidental way, without any systematic system of training and understanding of the ultimate goal, and are thus plagued with all kinds of faults. Varnasrama means precisely to offer such training, so people can understand what is the goal of life and walk towards this goal.